Archives > News

Print | | Comment (4 comment(s)) | Rate | Text Size

Staggs outspends opponents 5:1


Published: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 6:12 PM CDT
Thelma Grimes/San Pedro Valley News-Sun

Bruce Staggs is outspending his opponents by a factor of 5 to 1 in the race for Justice of the Peace for Precinct 3.

According to the second quarter financial reports, Staggs, a Republican candidate running in the primary election against incumbent Joe Knoblock and challenger Eliot Montijo, has $7,391.25 cash on hand.

Staggs reported a total of $12,704 in funds raised, with a majority of that coming from a personal loan taken out by Staggs.


Besides a $7,704 personal loan, Staggs donated $5,000 to his campaign in March.

After spending $1,564 in the second quarter, Knoblock reported having $265.44 cash on hand. Knoblock is running for a second term.

Montijo, who spent $428 in the second quarter, reported having $1,006.45 cash on hand.

The Republican candidates will face off in the Aug. 24 primary election.

The Republican winner will face Democrat Marv Sorensen and Independent Virgil Judd in the November general election.



Previous   Next
Candidate speaks at Rotary club   Jean Nelson, longtime Mescal-J6 fire member dies

Article Rating

Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of bensonnews-sun.com.

Maggie wrote on Jul 21, 2010 6:36 PM:

" Am I the only one who is confused? Which is it, Ms. Grimes, either Mr. Staggs "raised" the money or he is using ALL his own money for his campaign. I know Mr. Staggs and know for a fact that he is using his own money. So, I say to you, shame on you! "

cdg wrote on Jul 22, 2010 6:01 AM:

" Just what we need for a JP. A scoff-law trespasser who thinks he can buy votes. "

negodkia wrote on Jul 22, 2010 6:04 AM:

" To Maggie:

Ms. Grimes stated, "Staggs reported a total of $12,704 in funds raised, with a majority of that coming from a personal loan taken out by Staggs."

"Raising money" does not necessarily imply obtaining money from others, as you apparently assume in your attack on Ms. Grimes.

But, even if it did, how does a poor choice of word deserve a "shame on you"?

Shame on YOU for such a thoughtless attack. "

JUDY wrote on Aug 6, 2010 6:55 PM:

" NEGODKIA - It deserves a "shame on you" for the simple fact that the woman is supposedly an "award" winning reporter and as such should know how to properly report the news, using proper spelling, grammar, and sentence composition not to mention proper "word choice". "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
We will not post comments that we know to be factually inaccurate, nor will we post personal attacks.
(optional)
   
Return to: News « | Home « | Top of Page ^
Benson, AZ


Sponsored by: